• Home
    • Antique Bottle Identification
    • Bourbon 101
    • Events / Travel / News
    • Whiskey History and Laws
    • Whiskey Projects
    • Series: "Ask Arok"
    • Series: "If You've Had..."
    • Series: Interviews
    • Series: "My Wandering Eye..."
    • Series: Whiskey Brackets
    • Recipes: Cocktail Recipes
    • Recipes: Cooking and Recipes
    • Rating: Love
    • Rating: Like
    • Rating: Neutral
    • Rating: Dislike
    • Reviews: Bars, Books, and Retailers
    • Reviews: Beer and Other Non-Whiskey
    • Reviews: Bourbon
    • Reviews: Canadian Whisky
    • Reviews: Cocktail Ingredients
    • Reviews: Cocktails: Ready to Drink
    • Reviews: Distillery Tours
    • Reviews: Misc Reviews
    • Reviews: Other Whiskey (Not Bourbon or Rye)
    • Reviews: Rye Whiskey
    • Producer: Barton
    • Producer: Brown Forman
    • Producer: Buffalo Trace
    • Producer: Diageo
    • Producer: Four Roses
    • Producer: Heaven Hill
    • Producer: Jim Beam (or Suntory)
    • Producer: Lux Row / Yellowstone
    • Producer: Maker's Mark
    • Producer: MGP / Ross & Squibb
    • Producer: Non-Distiller Producers
    • Producer: Sazerac
    • Producer: Small or Craft Distillers
    • Producer: Wild Turkey
    • Producer: Willett
    • Who the hell am I?
    • Statement of Ethics
  • Buy Some Merch
  • Tip me a Coffee
Menu

BOURBON GUY

Street Address
Prior Lake, MN
Phone Number
The Irreverent Home of Frugal Bourbon Drinkers Since 2012

Your Custom Text Here

BOURBON GUY

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Antique Bottle Identification
    • Bourbon 101
    • Events / Travel / News
    • Whiskey History and Laws
    • Whiskey Projects
    • Series: "Ask Arok"
    • Series: "If You've Had..."
    • Series: Interviews
    • Series: "My Wandering Eye..."
    • Series: Whiskey Brackets
    • Recipes: Cocktail Recipes
    • Recipes: Cooking and Recipes
  • Reviews
    • Rating: Love
    • Rating: Like
    • Rating: Neutral
    • Rating: Dislike
    • Reviews: Bars, Books, and Retailers
    • Reviews: Beer and Other Non-Whiskey
    • Reviews: Bourbon
    • Reviews: Canadian Whisky
    • Reviews: Cocktail Ingredients
    • Reviews: Cocktails: Ready to Drink
    • Reviews: Distillery Tours
    • Reviews: Misc Reviews
    • Reviews: Other Whiskey (Not Bourbon or Rye)
    • Reviews: Rye Whiskey
    • Producer: Barton
    • Producer: Brown Forman
    • Producer: Buffalo Trace
    • Producer: Diageo
    • Producer: Four Roses
    • Producer: Heaven Hill
    • Producer: Jim Beam (or Suntory)
    • Producer: Lux Row / Yellowstone
    • Producer: Maker's Mark
    • Producer: MGP / Ross & Squibb
    • Producer: Non-Distiller Producers
    • Producer: Sazerac
    • Producer: Small or Craft Distillers
    • Producer: Wild Turkey
    • Producer: Willett
  • About
    • Who the hell am I?
    • Statement of Ethics
  • Buy Some Merch
  • Tip me a Coffee
bourbonguy-production.png

Blog

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: The Championship Rounds

April 1, 2021 Eric Burke

Well, here we are again. Once again we’ve nearly made it to the end of the Bottom-Shelf Brackets competition. I hope everyone was playing along. And if not, that you’ve had enough of these to play along in your mind. It really is a fun exercise each year to sit down and pit inexpensive bourbons against each other. I say inexpensive instead of “bad” because there isn’t one of these that will be dumped out when this is done. I will use every one in some way or another. Either neat on its own, in a cocktail, or even as the base of a blend. They are all good bourbons, some are just better than others in my opinion. You’re welcome to form your own opinions as to whether I’m right.

But anyway, let’s get on to round two and see who advances. Both of these matchups feature a 1-seed versus a 2-seed. There haven’t been any upsets so far. Let’s see if that continues.

Round 2a: Whiskey 1 (Ezra Brooks) vs. Whiskey 2 (Evan Williams)

Thoughts: Very similar on the nose. Both are decent on the mouth. Vibrant cinnamon spice in each. The finish of #1 shows peanut where #2 Shows a zesty spice. #2 wins on the strength of a nicer and tastier finish.

Round 2b: Whiskey 1 (Very Old Barton) vs. Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey)

Thoughts: Once again the nose on each of these is similar with only slight differences to delicate notes. So the nose is a push. #1 has a nice mouthfeel with citrusy notes to go with the spicy notes. #2 was a little thin at first with a blossom of flavor after a few seconds in the mouth. Lots of baking spice notes in that blossoming. The finish is nice on both this time. I think I need to go with #2, but it is really close.

I’m not going to lie, I was very surprised to find out that Wild Turkey and Evan Wiliams won their rounds. As I stated above, we hadn’t had an upset yet and it was surprising to find not one, but two when all of the names were revealed at the end. I was especially surprised that the lower proof entry won each time.

Let’s see who our winner is.

Championship Round: Whiskey 1 (Evan Williams) vs. Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey)

Whiskey #1: Mint, cinnamon, citrus zest. Not too hot, but not bland. Tasty finish.

Whiskey #2: Sweeter. Brown sugar, baking spices. Spicier but a little rough in its spice by comparison.

Winner: #1 wins this one. Once again very close but #1 has a touch more complexity.

If you could have seen my face as we revealed which alphanumeric code was which bourbon, you wold have laughed. I went into this fully expecting Very Old Barton to win. I mean it had won previously, right? The fact that it didn’t even make it out of Round 2 caused my jaw to drop. And it dropped even further when I saw it had been beaten by one that I said probably wouldn’t win against stiffer competition just the round prior.

But the biggest shock of all was Evan Williams winning it all. I know that a lot of you saw that coming. But I certainly didn’t. Which is weird since I know that Evan Williams is good bourbon. Due to the nature of the need for content on the site, I almost never buy it. But it is good stuff. And super inexpensive as well. It just goes to show that even those of us who have been tasting bourbon for a lot of years have our biases and preconceived notions.

And to be honest, it is fitting that Evan Williams won. I started this series of posts talking about “Finding Joy in the Ordinary.” And Evan Williams could be the patron saint of ordinary bourbon. Notice I said ordinary, not bad, bourbon. Evan Williams is good, plentiful, inexpensive and available in multiple styles and proof levels. I couldn’t have planned a more thematically accurate winner. I think that’s pretty cool.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Barton, Bourbon, Heaven Hill, Wild Turkey, Lux Row-Yellowstone, Brackets
1 Comment

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: Round 1: Wild Turkey vs. Rebel Yell

March 30, 2021 Eric Burke

I am going to let you know right now, that neither of these bourbons have ever made it past the first round. In fact, I’d made pretty disparaging remarks about both of these during their prior appearances. I really did not like Rebel Yell in 2014. In fact, Old Crow Reserve (remember that one?) beat it. In the intervening years, the bourbon has gotten better, but I’ve also grown more tolerant of heated bourbons. And in 2016, I described Wild Turkey as “gentle” which isn’t something that I’d have historically thought to use for anything from the brand.

Of course, one of these has to win tonight. So no matter who wins, it’ll be their first. And when the entire contest is blind from start to finish, and you have no preconceived notions about what is in the glass other than “this is one of eight bourbons,” well, then all bets are off. So let’s watch history being made.

Our first whiskey is our number two seed for Division Two. Coming in at 81 proof and looking to see if its rye grains can run over the wheated competition, please welcome: Wild Turkey!

And their opponent is the only wheated bourbon in the competition. Please welcome Rebel Yell!

Reminder, all of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew what juice won the competition prior to the reveal of what any of the names were. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Whiskey 1 (Wild Turkey)

Purchase Info: $18.49 for a 1-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.93

Details: 40.5% ABV.

Nose: Mint leaves, hints of cinnamon, caramel, and almond.

Mouth: Thin mouthfeel. Notes of cinnamon, caramel, and citrus zest.

Finish: Short and gentle with notes of cinnamon and caramel.

Thoughts:  Not bad. The citrus zest was an interesting "twist" I hadn't expected.

Whiskey 2 (Rebel Yell)

Purchase Info: $14.99 for a 750 mL bottle, MGM Wine & Spirits, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $1.00

Details: 40% ABV.

Nose: Herbal and grassy like a mint chamomile tea blend.

Mouth: Follows the nose with the addition of a cinnamon note.

Finish: Short and uncomplicated. Notes of caramel, cinnamon, dried grains, and an old stick you found in the yard.

Thoughts: Not much going on in this one. It's fine for what it is, but it isn't much.

Winner: This is a pretty easy decision. I like everything going on with #2, I just need it to be more concentrated. It was just a bit too delicate for me. #1 also isn't a great whiskey but is enough to hold my interest. #1 wins, though I'm not sure either would advance against stronger competition.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, whiskey reviews, Wild Turkey, Lux Row-Yellowstone, Brackets
Comment

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: Round 1: Very Old Barton 86 proof vs. Old Grand-Dad 80 proof

March 25, 2021 Eric Burke

Fun fact. Both of the names on tonight’s labels have won this annual contest before. In the case of Very Old Barton, the 86 proof version was the winner in 2016. For Old Grand-Dad, it was the Bottled-in-Bond version that won in 2018. Old Grand-Dad 80 proof has never made it out of the first round. Let’s see if history repeats itself tonight.

Our first whiskey is our number one seed for Division Two. Coming in at 86 proof and looking to notch its second bracket championship, please welcome: Very Old Barton 86 proof!

And their opponent is the lowest-proof bourbon in Beam’s Old Grand-Dad line. The lower price (and lower quality?) version of Basil Hayden’s, please welcome Old Grand-Dad 80 proof!

Reminder, all of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Whiskey 1 (Very Old Barton)

Purchase Info: $15.99 for a 1-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.80

Details: 43% ABV.

Nose: Delicate. Mint, cinnamon, and floral notes.

Mouth: Follows the nose with mint, cinnamon, caramel, and floral notes.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Cinnamon and dried grains with a little caramel thrown in.

Thoughts:  The nose is so delicate as to be almost non-existent. The mouth and finish provide more punch than the nose would suggest. Not a bad value bourbon.

Whiskey 2 (Old Grand-Dad)

Purchase Info: $17.99 for a 1-liter bottle, Blue Max, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.90

Details: 40% ABV.

Nose: Caramel, red fruit, and a hint of mint.

Mouth: Caramel, cinnamon, vanilla, red fruit.

Finish: Gentle and medium length. Caramel, cinnamon, and a mineral note.

Thoughts: This is ok. That mineral note on the finish is throwing me a little. There is definitely a lot of flavor, I'm just not sure that it's a good flavor.

Winner: This was a fairly easy decision. #1 has a classic "value bourbon" flavor. Good, uncomplicated, tasty, and showing a touch of grain. #2 is a caramel bomb with an odd funk to it. It isn't bad, but I'm not sure I'm likely to reach for it once I know what it is. #1 wins easily.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Barton, Bourbon, whiskey reviews, Brackets, Jim Beam
1 Comment

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: Round 1: Evan Williams vs. Jim Beam

March 23, 2021 Eric Burke

What a cool matchup we have in store tonight. We are featuring the world’s top two selling bourbons by volume (if you set aside that one from Tennessee that doesn’t want to be called a bourbon). Jim Beam is the world’s top-selling bourbon and Evan Williams is right behind them at number two. I didn’t plan this, it was luck of the seeding that set these two titans against each other, but that doesn’t mean that I wasn’t super excited once I realized it.

First up is our number two seed for Division One. Coming in at 86 proof and looking so good in black, please welcome: Evan Williams!

And its opponent is the number one selling bourbon across the world. Behemoth barely begins to describe this white-labeled giant, please welcome: Jim Beam!

Reminder, all of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Whiskey 1 (Evan Williams)

Purchase Info: $12.99 for a 1-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.65

Details: 43% ABV.

Nose: Spearmint, caramel, and nutmeg.

Mouth: Caramel, mint, cinnamon candies.

Finish: Shorter side of medium. Notes of cinnamon and peanut butter cookies.

Thoughts:  Not bad. Not bad at all. Classic value bourbon flavor profile.

Whiskey 2 (Jim Beam)

Purchase Info: $13.99 for a 750 mL bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.93

Details: 40% ABV.

Nose: Peanut, caramel, green vegetables.

Mouth: Thin mouthfeel. Caramel and cinnamon.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Peanuts and dried grains.

Thoughts: Even blind, I think I know what this is. The distinctive peanut note gives it away. though considering at least half of the participants are made by-or source from- Beam, I am fully prepared to be wrong. I like the finish, the mouth leaves a bit to be desired and I'm ambivalent regarding the nose.

Winner: I like the finish on #2 better but I prefer the nose and mouth on #1. #1 wins.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, Heaven Hill, whiskey reviews, Brackets, Jim Beam
1 Comment

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: Round 1: Ezra Brooks vs. Benchmark

March 18, 2021 Eric Burke

Here we go! Let’s get down to the competitions. I hope that you guys are as excited by this as I am. Round 1 of the 2021 BourbonGuy.com Bottom Shelf Brackets opens with Division 1 Number 1 seed Ezra Brooks versus Number 4 seed Benchmark. 

An interesting thing about both of these products is that neither of the brands originated with their current producers. Benchmark was a Seagram’s brand and Ezra Brooks was created by Frank Silverman in 1957 as a brand to directly compete with Jack Daniels. Current iterations are produced by Buffalo Trace and Lux Row Distillers respectively.

So, first up is the flagship product, and namesake of the Ezra Brooks lineup, and a long-time product of the Luxco/Lux Row. Spawning two current line extensions (Old Ezra 7 Year Barrel Proof and Ezra Brooks 99) and even more discontinued ones, please welcome to the stage the one that started them all: Ezra Brooks!

And their opponent is a true bottom-shelf release. Produced by the Buffalo Trace Distillery and aged for only three years before bottling, please welcome: Benchmark Bourbon!

All of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Whiskey 1 (Ezra Brooks)

Purchase Info: $12.99 for a 1-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.65

Details: 45% ABV.

Nose: Spearmint, dried grain, and vanilla.

Mouth: Cinnamon red hots, spearmint, and just a hint of dried grain.

Finish: Sweet and Spicy. Cinnamon red hots and spearmint linger.

Thoughts:  This is a relatively spicy one. A nice flavor of cinnamon red hots playing with spearmint.

Whiskey 2 (Benchmark)

Purchase Info: $13.49 for a 1-liter bottle, MGM Wine & Spirits, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.67

Details: 40% ABV.

Nose: Caramel, buttered popcorn, and a hint of vanilla.

Mouth: Caramel, cinnamon, and milk chocolate.

Finish: Warm and medium length. Follows the month with cinnamon, caramel, and milk chocolate.

Thoughts: Sweet like a piece of candy. this is nice. Uncomplicated but very nice.

Winner: Whiskey 2 has a thinner mouthfeel and a candy-like flavor. Whiskey 1 is spicier and drier. If #2 had the mouthfeel and complexity of # 1, it would be the clear winner. Same if #1 had the sweetness of #2. As it stands each of these has a lot going for it, but also has one aspect that holds me back from an easy decision. In the end, I think the spicy cinnamon and nicer mouthfeel gives #1 an edge over #2. I look forward to finishing both of these bottles, but #1 is advancing to round 2.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Buffalo Trace, whiskey reviews, Lux Row-Yellowstone, Brackets
2 Comments

8th Annual BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Brackets: The "Find Joy in the Ordinary" Edition

March 16, 2021 Eric Burke
IMAGE: A screen capture of the time with the words “Find Joy in the Ordinary” below it.

I like to use a Chrome plugin called Momentum as a home screen for my instance of the Chrome browser. It has a new pretty photo every day. It tells me the time, local weather, and helps me with my to-do list. Recently it started showing “Mantras” below the time. I found the one pictured above to be particularly meaningful. “Find Joy in the Ordinary.”

It’s sometimes hard to do as a bourbon lover, finding joy in the ordinary. The entire purpose of a site like this is to give people a sense of what is new and exciting. Even if it is only new and exciting to me. So, this year I’ve made a commitment to myself to step back a little and to do what the computer screen told me to do. Find Joy in the Ordinary.

And, perfect timing, it’s time for the Bottom Shelf Bourbon Brackets again. Maybe it is just me, but I haven’t heard a lot of talk about the NCAA tournament this year…and I’m fully willing to admit that it may be because my beloved Golden Gophers were bad enough this year that the coach was fired at the end of the season. I might just be hiding from any news that has to do with the yearly basketball tournament.

Of course, as long-time readers know, I don’t really like basketball anyway. In fact, this series was started eight years ago as a way to play along with all the folks around me filling out their brackets, while not caring about basketball.

In recent years, I’ve gotten caught up in the excitement of more “interesting” bourbons. Two years ago, I decided to let the readers choose who participated. Last year, I threw out the concept of “Bottom-Shelf” entirely. But this year, following the advice of the computer screen, I’ve decided to find joy in the ordinary. And as such, I’m going old-school on this one. Back to the original rules. Back to some really “ordinary” bourbons. Things that would have been participants from the first few years before I started messing with the rules.

Here are the rules:

  1. In keeping with the theme, it had to be “ordinary.” No Single barrel, no small batch. No Bottled in Bond. Anything that might be used to call something special was thrown out. This is for true entry-level bourbons.

  2. The original rules stated that it had to be under $15 for a 750 mL bottle or under $20 for a liter bottle. I decided to keep that.

  3. The original rules also stated that entries had to be Straight Bourbon Whiskey. I saw no reason to change that.

  4. Participants were seeded based on proof and then age. Higher proof equals a higher seeding. If you stated a bourbon’s age when you didn’t have to, you got a nod over those, at the same proof, who didn’t. If you stated a bourbon’s age because you were young enough that the law required it, someone else got the nod over you.

  5. These were tasted blind. I had no idea what each of the participants was when I tasted them. I poured 200mL bottles of each bourbon. I labeled them with an alphanumeric code and then filled out an initial bracket with those codes. Until we were finished I never saw the bracket or the bottles that were being poured again. My wife (who didn’t know which code corresponded to each bourbon) poured each round and filled out the winners in secret.

So, let’s meet the 2021 competition, shall we? Coming in at the number one overall seed is Ezra Brooks from Lux Row Distillery. This seeding comes down to proof, at 90 proof, this was the highest proof bourbon in the competition. They will initially match up against number four seed, Benchmark Bourbon from Buffalo Trace. At only “36 months” and 80 proof, this was the lowest seed in the competition. Rounding out Division One is a matchup between Heaven Hill’s Evan Williams Black Label and BeamSuntory’s Jim Beam White Label. Due to being 86 proof, Evan Williams was the second seed and due to stating its age, Jim Beam White gets the nod over other 80 proof offerings to take the first number three seed.

Over in Division Two, we have Very Old Barton (86 proof) from the Barton 1792 Distillery as the number one seed. They match up against Beam Suntory’s number four seed Old Grand Dad (80 Proof). In the second matchup, we have number two seed Wild Turkey (81 proof) against number three seed Rebel Yell from Lux Row.

This should be fun. Let’s go find joy in ordinary bourbon. So who’ve you got? Let everyone know down in the comments.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Barton, Bourbon, Heaven Hill, Buffalo Trace, Wild Turkey, Lux Row-Yellowstone, Brackets, Jim Beam
4 Comments

Fall Brackets 2020: Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch Edition: Who won?

October 6, 2020 Eric Burke

As you are probably aware, this is the last installment of a five-part series where I pit various Limited Edition bottles of Four Roses against each other, bracket-style. The idea grew out of a conversation I had with Four Roses Master Distiller Brent Elliot last September. When I mentioned that I had bottles of this release going back to 2012, he asked what I was saving them for. Not having a good answer to that, I decided then and there that he was right and that I needed to have some fun with them. And since I couldn't get a bottle of 2020's version, it seemed like the right time to open them up and revisit a little yummy goodness.

Tonight we get to see which of these I liked best. My friend Fred Minnick picked 2013 as his Best Bourbon of the 21st Century So Far. If you’ve been following along, you will know that 2013 lost in the first round in a head-to-head taste-off. But, we all have different palates and we all like different things. This is what makes whiskey so much fun to talk about. Besides, 2013 was delicious. It came so close to winning its matchup.

Tonight we are looking at Round2 and the Championship all at once. I’ve been sitting on these results for over a month now and I can’t take it anymore. So without further adieu, let’s get down to it. We aren’t going to go into tasting notes, since we already did that. This is just comparative thoughts for each matchup. And remember, these were tasted completely blind from identical bottles labeled only with an alphanumeric code.

Four Roses Brackets Limited Edition Small Batch, Round 2

2015 vs. 2017

2015 has a nicer nose. Both are fruity but 2015 has more depth to the nose. 2015 has a better mouthfeel and leads with more spicy notes. 2017 is more fruit-forward and has a thinner mouthfeel relative to 2015. But, I love the way that the fruit presents on the 2017 edition. This is super tough but I think I have to give the nod to 2015.

2019 vs. 2012

The noses on these two are fairly similar. Sweet notes and oak. On the mouth, the 2019 edition is richer than the 2012 one. On my first sip of 2019, I just sighed and said "that tastes like classic Four Roses." And because of all that, 2019 advances.

Championship: 2019 vs. 2015

Once again, 2015 has a nicer nose. Sweeter and very slightly richer. On the mouth, 2019 is richer, spicier, and hotter. 2015 is fruitier but still brings the spice." But in the end, 2019 and that "classic Four Roses" flavor wins the day.

So there you have it. In my estimation, last year’s version of Four Roses Limited Small Batch was the best to that point. It was shocking since I remember liking some of them, like 2016, so much in the initial tasting. If asked ahead of time, I would have sworn that 2016 was going to with the whole thing. In fact, I even told Brent Elliot when I talked to him about last year’s, that I preferred 2018. The same 2018 that didn’t make it out of the first round. I guess it just goes to show that memories are fallible and tasting isn’t a science. As I always say, this is what I thought of and how much I liked a whiskey on that day. Another day might bring another mood which might bring another feeling about what is in my glass.

But before we close out this competition, I saved just a taste of the 2020 sample to compare against the eventual winner. And I have to say, although it was tough and both were delicious, 2020 was the winner for both of us. It had all the spice and heat of 2019, but brought just a touch more fruit to the party. Which, when we are talking about Four Roses, is totally what I come for. Congrats to Brent Elliot and crew.

Ok. Regular posts return Thursday. Thanks for coming along on this exploration with me and allowing me to miss my trip to Kentucky a little less.

Special thanks to Four Roses Master Distiller Brent Elliot for inspiring this series of posts.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Four Roses, whiskey reviews, Bourbon, Brackets, Events-Travel-News
3 Comments

Fall Brackets 2020: Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch Edition: Round 1d, 2016 vs. 2012

October 1, 2020 Eric Burke

As you are probably aware, this is the fourth installment of a five-part series where I pit various Limited Edition bottles of Four Roses against each other, bracket-style. The idea grew out of a conversation I had with Four Roses Master Distiller Brent Elliot last September. When I mentioned that I had bottles of this going back to 2012, he asked what I was saving them for. Not having a good answer to that, I decided then and there that he was right and that I needed to have some fun with them. And since I wasn't able to get a bottle of 2020's version, it seemed like the right time to open them up and revisit a little yummy goodness.

Tonight’s first contestant is the 2016 edition of Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch. 2016 was the year where I got to be “press” for the first time. While I visited the Kentucky Bourbon Festival I got to attend the Distillery Naming event for Lux Row Distillery. I took notes and photos…and my friends from local craft distilleries playfully teased me about it. I loved that week. I spent so much time with friends.

The other entry is from 2012. 2012 was the first year I attended the Kentucky Bourbon Festival. During that week, I visited the Four Roses Cox’s Creek facility for the first time. While there I picked up a bottle of Four Roses Limited Small Batch. I just walked into the very small gift shop and it was just sitting there on the shelf. This was a Monday It wasn’t set to be released until Thursday, but since no one had been there for about a week, they felt it was safe to put it out when they had time.

So here we go. Remember, these were tasted completely blind from identical bottles labeled only with an alphanumeric code.

Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch 2016

Original Review: 2016 Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch Review

Pertinent Quote: "I love this every year and this year is no exception."

Details/Original Price: 55.6% ABV. A blend of 12-year-old OESO, 12-year-old OBSV, and 16-year-old OESK. Purchase Price: $120.

Nose: Caramel, vanilla, spearmint, and a nutty note.

Mouth: Caramel, apricot, spearmint, and oak

Finish: Medium to long and warm. Lingering notes of cinnamon, oak, a touch of smoke, and a hint of fruitiness

Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch 2012

Original Review: Blind comparison of 2012 Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch vs 2009 Four Roses Mariage

Pertinent Quote: "Wow. This might very well be the best Four Roses, I've ever had. My wife normally puts a small piece of ice in every bourbon. She asked me to remind her that this one she wants neat from now on."

Original Details/Price: 55.7% ABV. A blend of 17-year-old OBSV, 11-year-old OBSV, 12-year-old OBSK, and 12-year-old OESK Purchase Price: $90

Nose: Peaches, baking spice, and brown sugar.

Mouth: Spicy. Notes of caramel, fruit, cinnamon, nutmeg, maybe ginger, and then oak.

Finish: Long and spicy. Notes of peaches, baking spice, vanilla, and oak.

Thoughts:

2016 is oakier and more refined whereas 2012 is an explosion of flavor. A lot of bourbon lovers would choose 2016 for its more traditional flavor profile. Not me though, the fruity notes of 2012 are right up my alley. 2012 is the clear favorite in this house. It’s spicy and fruity with a good burn to it. 2012 moves on.

Special thanks to Four Roses Master Distiller Brent Elliot for inspiring this series of posts.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Four Roses, whiskey reviews, Brackets, Events-Travel-News
Comment
← Newer Posts Older Posts →

Want to support BourbonGuy.com? Please visit BourbonGuyGifts.com today!

Subscribe

Never miss another article! Sign up with your email address to receive an email notification when a new article publishes.

We respect your privacy.

Thank you!

by-nc.png

Except where otherwise noted, this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license. Some rights reserved.