• Home
    • Antique Bottle Identification
    • Bourbon 101
    • Events / Travel / News
    • Whiskey History and Laws
    • Whiskey Projects
    • Series: "Ask Arok"
    • Series: "If You've Had..."
    • Series: Interviews
    • Series: "My Wandering Eye..."
    • Series: Whiskey Brackets
    • Recipes: Cocktail Recipes
    • Recipes: Cooking and Recipes
    • Rating: Love
    • Rating: Like
    • Rating: Neutral
    • Rating: Dislike
    • Reviews: Bars, Books, and Retailers
    • Reviews: Beer and Other Non-Whiskey
    • Reviews: Bourbon
    • Reviews: Canadian Whisky
    • Reviews: Cocktail Ingredients
    • Reviews: Cocktails: Ready to Drink
    • Reviews: Distillery Tours
    • Reviews: Misc Reviews
    • Reviews: Other Whiskey (Not Bourbon or Rye)
    • Reviews: Rye Whiskey
    • Producer: Barton
    • Producer: Brown Forman
    • Producer: Buffalo Trace
    • Producer: Diageo
    • Producer: Four Roses
    • Producer: Heaven Hill
    • Producer: Jim Beam (or Suntory)
    • Producer: Lux Row / Yellowstone
    • Producer: Maker's Mark
    • Producer: MGP / Ross & Squibb
    • Producer: Non-Distiller Producers
    • Producer: Sazerac
    • Producer: Small or Craft Distillers
    • Producer: Wild Turkey
    • Producer: Willett
    • Who the hell am I?
    • Statement of Ethics
  • Buy Some Merch
  • Tip me a Coffee
Menu

BOURBON GUY

Street Address
Prior Lake, MN
Phone Number
The Irreverent Home of Frugal Bourbon Drinkers Since 2012

Your Custom Text Here

BOURBON GUY

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Antique Bottle Identification
    • Bourbon 101
    • Events / Travel / News
    • Whiskey History and Laws
    • Whiskey Projects
    • Series: "Ask Arok"
    • Series: "If You've Had..."
    • Series: Interviews
    • Series: "My Wandering Eye..."
    • Series: Whiskey Brackets
    • Recipes: Cocktail Recipes
    • Recipes: Cooking and Recipes
  • Reviews
    • Rating: Love
    • Rating: Like
    • Rating: Neutral
    • Rating: Dislike
    • Reviews: Bars, Books, and Retailers
    • Reviews: Beer and Other Non-Whiskey
    • Reviews: Bourbon
    • Reviews: Canadian Whisky
    • Reviews: Cocktail Ingredients
    • Reviews: Cocktails: Ready to Drink
    • Reviews: Distillery Tours
    • Reviews: Misc Reviews
    • Reviews: Other Whiskey (Not Bourbon or Rye)
    • Reviews: Rye Whiskey
    • Producer: Barton
    • Producer: Brown Forman
    • Producer: Buffalo Trace
    • Producer: Diageo
    • Producer: Four Roses
    • Producer: Heaven Hill
    • Producer: Jim Beam (or Suntory)
    • Producer: Lux Row / Yellowstone
    • Producer: Maker's Mark
    • Producer: MGP / Ross & Squibb
    • Producer: Non-Distiller Producers
    • Producer: Sazerac
    • Producer: Small or Craft Distillers
    • Producer: Wild Turkey
    • Producer: Willett
  • About
    • Who the hell am I?
    • Statement of Ethics
  • Buy Some Merch
  • Tip me a Coffee
bourbonguy-production.png

Blog

The BourbonGuy.com "Stuck at Home" Bourbon Brackets

April 7, 2020 Eric Burke

Wow. It seems like it has been just a moment since we last had a bracket around here. I mean time really flies, doesn't i...

What's that? Uh-huh. Yeah. Yeah. Huh. Ok, well.

I've just been informed that it actually was only about a minute since I last had a bracket competition around here. Well, what am I still doing here then?

Oh, that's right. I can't leave at the moment. I, like many of you, are currently living under a Stay-at-Home order due to the pandemic. And though, the liquor stores are deemed an essential business in Minnesota, I'd rather not expose myself any more than I have too. Besides, when it comes to stocking up on liquor, I've been preparing for an extended stay at home for years now. 

To that end, I'm going to take the opportunity to address something that it seemed people were really looking for in the Bottom-Shelf Brackets. Parity. Specifically proof parity (I already had price parity). I had comments on more than one post that stated that certain bourbons were at a competitive disadvantage due to the wide range of proof levels amongst the competition. And while that would usually cause me to explain that the Bottom Shelf Brackets are a "what's best for the price" competition and not a "what's best" competition, this time, I had the thought of: "Well, I'm stuck here anyway." Especially when I realized that if proof was the deciding factor, then I could not only reuse a few of the bottles from the Bottom-Shelf Bracket but that I also had a lot of potential competitors in my bourbon closet.

And so I am pleased to announce the BourbonGuy.com "Stuck at Home" Bourbon Brackets. The qualification rules are simple: Be 100 or 101 proof. Of course, nothing is as easy as it seems. I had 10 qualifying bourbons in the house. I had the tough choice to make between eliminating a couple or adding a couple. When a reader donated $25 to the cause, I knew it had to be to add a couple. I called up my local liquor store and placed a delivery order for a bottle of bourbon. I also decided to let Four Roses Small Batch Select join the competition since it was only a few proof points higher. And once again, to keep it simple, seeding was done on price. The highest price equals the highest seed. After a few swaps to get rid of repeat matchups from last week, we are left with the following. I bracketed these via NFL playoff rules, meaning the top four seeds get a first-round bye. 

  • Proving that price was no object in this competition, the number one seed overall is Four Roses Small Batch Select. I got this at Total Wine on my last Kentucky trip for $49.99. 

  • Across the bracket from that is Division 2 number one seed Maker's Mark 101 proof. I got this at the Maker's Mark gift shop for $49.99. 

  • Division one number two seed is a store pick of 1792 Bottled in Bond. I got this at South Lyndale Liquors in Minneapolis for $44.99. 

  • The next one might be a bit controversial since it has been discontinued. I seeded it based on its replacement's current price instead of the price that I paid for it. Division two number two seed is Heaven Hill Bottled in Bond 6 year. I didn't have any of the 7-year around, and honestly, when I reviewed it, I didn't find much difference between the two. You can get the 7-year, when available, for around $40

  • The first seed in our "Wildcard round" is division one, 3 seed Henry McKenna Bottled in Bond. I bought this at my closest Total Wine for $33.99. This was also one of the swaps that were made to reduce repetition from last week. They are going up against division one, number six seed JW Dant Bottled in Bond, which I bought at South Lyndale for $16.99. A battle of Heaven Hill Bonded Bourbons.

  • Over in division two, we have number three seed Four Roses Single Barrel ($42.99 at Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake) going up against Bottom-Shelf Bracket Champion Wild Turkey 101 proof ($18.49 at Total Wine, Burnsville). Let's see how Wild Turkey does against competition where it isn't overwhelming its opponent with proof.

  • The final competition in division one is number four seed Johnny Drum Private Select ($33.97 at Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake) versus Knob Creek Bourbon ($24.98 at Ace Spirits, Hopkins). 

  • And finally, we have division 2 number four seed Old Forester 100 proof ($24.99 at Total Wine, Burnsville) versus Very Old Barton 100 proof (purchased for $12.99 at a Total Wine in Kentucky).

I think this is going to be a fun competition. Once again, I'd like to thank reader David Brown for helping with the cost. It would have been a much smaller competition without his help as I would have probably made the decision to go down to eight contestants instead of going up to twelve without that support.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Barton, Bourbon, Brown Forman, Four Roses, Heaven Hill, Sazerac, Wild Turkey, Brackets, Makers Mark, Jim Beam
1 Comment

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2020: The Championship Rounds

April 2, 2020 Eric Burke

Well, here we are folks. We’ve come to the end of the Bottom-Shelf Bourbon Brackets for 2020. We’ve had a lot of good competition to this point and a lot of good discussion in the comments. It has been a fun year…if only we weren’t all stuck at home under Stay-at-Home orders.

I want to thank you for checking in this year. I know that there is a lot going on in the world outside our homes. It is a little scary. The cabin fever sets in easy. I’m pretty sure that my dogs are still not sure why my wife has been staying home. One has taken to following her around and making sure that she is always in sight. I think she is worried. And to be honest I’m guessing that we all are, at least a little bit. So it’s nice to have a bit of diversion.

So let’s get down to business. I hope you’ve been playing along. If not, there is nothing stopping you from going back and seeing if you get the same results. I did my best to try to get bottles that have a good chance of being in most well-stocked bourbon collections.

Round 2a: Wild Turkey 101 vs. Maker’s Mark

Nose: Whiskey Two has a much sweeter nose, almost a caramel bomb, compared to Whiskey One, which is more nuanced.

Mouth: Whiskey One shows more oak on the mouth, whereas Whiskey Two tends toward grain by comparison. Whiskey Two is sweet and minty, while Whiskey One is sweet and spicy.

Pre-Reveal Thoughts: This is a hard match-up, and honestly, I keep going back and forth as to which I like better. When I taste Whiskey One first, I get a sharpness that I find just a tad unpleasant. Then when I move to Whiskey Two, I find it's sweetness to be a nice relief. If I taste Whiskey Two first, it feels a tiny bit unimpressive. But when I then move to Whiskey One, the sharpness is gone and I am impressed with the baking spice on display. These two whiskeys complement each other very well. Gah! It's so hard! But I think I'm going to have to go with the spice on Whiskey One.

Reveal: Whiskey One is Wild Turkey. Whiskey Two is Maker's Mark.

Post-Reveal Thoughts: There is a good explanation as to why this was so hard. I'm a Wild Turkey fanboy but also a Maker's Mark Ambassador. I love both of them. In the end, it was the oak and spice that nudged Wild Turkey 101 into advancing to the Championship. The rye bourbon beat the wheated one. I should have seen that coming.

Round 2b: Knob Creek Bourbon vs. Old Forester 100 proof

Nose: Whiskey One is like walking past a Cinnabon, where Whiskey Two is more floral but with a hint of dental antiseptic.

Mouth: Whiskey One is all orange peel and baking spice with some peanut thrown in on the finish. Whiskey Two has an excellent mouthfeel and is full of mint and caramel. Both of these have a nice finish.

Pre-Reveal Thoughts: These two are very different experiences. On Whiskey Two, the finish is an extension of the mouth. Rich and minty and lasts a good bit of time after you swallow. With Whiskey One, once you swallow your mouth notes go away to be replaced by the finish notes. And those sets of notes only have a little overlap. It's like "spicy orange peel, swallow, spicy peanut." Whiskey Two wins this one easily.

Reveal: Whiskey One is Knob Creek, Whiskey Two is Old Forester

Post-Reveal Thoughts: I was not shocked by the reveal. The antiseptic note on the nose of Two and the peanut note on the finish of One was pretty much a dead giveaway that Two was Old Forester 100 and that One was Knob Creek. What I didn't expect was how much more I was enjoying the Old Forester than I was the Knob Creek. In my internal ranking of bourbons, I’d always thought of Knob Creek as “Higher End” than Old Forester. But that’s why I do these blind. Old Forester 100 advances to the Championship.

Championship Round: Wild Turkey 101 proof vs. Old Forester 100 proof

Nose: The noses on these are very similar. Whiskey One is drier, and Whiskey Two is a little richer and is sweeter.

Mouth: Whiskey One shows more oak and has a warmer finish. Whiskey Two has a lot of baking spice and honey. The spice follows along to the finish.

Pre-Reveal Thoughts: Whiskey Two has a wonderful mouthfeel when compared to Whiskey One. The fact that I am enjoying the flavor more is just icing on the cake. Whiskey Two wins this one easily.

Reveal: Whiskey One is Old Forester 100, Whiskey Two is Wild Turkey 101.

Post-Reveal Thoughts: I'm not going to lie, I was kinda rooting for Old Forester on this one. If only so that we'd get some new blood in the winner's circle. But here we are again, even when we increase the selling price of the competition Wild Turkey 101 is still king of the inexpensive bourbon scene.

I think it might be time to retire the old bird from competition. But before we do, let's really throw some competition at it. Since I'm stuck in my house until at least Easter, let's raid my closet for as many 100-105 proof bourbons as I can and see how the bird holds up when it can 't overpower the competition with higher proof. Check back next week to see who the competitors are!


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, Brown Forman, Wild Turkey, Brackets, Makers Mark, Jim Beam
5 Comments

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2020: Round 1: Elijah Craig vs. Maker's Mark

March 26, 2020 Eric Burke

I’ve had suggestions that the first two rounds may have been unfair contests due to the difference in the proof of the contestants. Well, those concerns should be put to rest tonight as we feature a pair of contestants that are only 2% ABV different from one another. Round 1 of the 2020 BourbonGuy.com Bottom Shelf Brackets continues with Division 1 Number 2 seed Elijah Craig versus Number 3 seed Maker’s Mark.  

First up, the formerly twelve-year-old release from Heaven Hill. Now non-age stated but claimed to be around eight years old. Named for the man that Heaven Hill’s marketing department claims is “the Father of Bourbon,” please welcome to the stage: Elijah Craig!!!

And their opponent, the bourbon that once advertised itself as “it tastes expensive because it is” but is now available in the sub $25 range. Please welcome one of my favorite bourbons: Maker’s Mark!!!

We strive to have a clean competition so these were tasted blind in the following order. Tasting notes are from before the reveal and may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and may influence one another.

Whiskey 1 (Maker’s Mark)

Purchase Info: $19.99 for a 750 mL bottle, Blue Max, Burnsville, MN

Details: 45% ABV.

Nose: Spearmint, nutmeg, vanilla, caramel.

Mouth: Follows the nose with mint, nutmeg, vanilla, caramel.

Finish: Longer side of medium. Spearmint, caramel, nutmeg.

Whiskey 2 (Elijah Craig)

Purchase Info: $21.98 for a 750 mL bottle, Ace Spirits, Hopkins, MN

Details: 47% ABV.

Nose: Oak, cinnamon, strawberry candy.

Mouth: Cinnamon, oak, butterscotch.

Finish: Medium length. Cinnamon, old-fashioned strawberry candy.

Pre-reveal Thoughts: I really like both of these. A lot. I am going to have to be super nit-picky in order to come up with a winner. There is a very slight sharp "punky" oak note to number two that number one does not have. Even this isn't so much of a flaw as a preference. And I prefer number one by a very slight margin.

Post-Reveal Thoughts: Close one tonight. Had to really nit-pick to choose a winner. And picking that nit lead to an upset. Number three seed Maker’s Mark advances over Number two seed Elijah Craig.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, Heaven Hill, whiskey reviews, Brackets, I Like This!, Makers Mark
Comment

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2020: Round 1: Knob Creek vs. Very Old Barton 86 proof

March 24, 2020 Eric Burke

Tonight we get a fun one, at least for me. Round 1 of the 2020 BourbonGuy.com Bottom Shelf Brackets continues with Division 2 Number 1 seed Knob Creek versus Number 4 seed Very Old Barton 86 proof. This is fun for a couple of reasons. First, this is the first time Knob Creek has been in the competition and it only got the number one seed on the basis of a coin flip. Secondly, it is going up against a former Bottom-Shelf Champion in Very Old Barton.  

So here we go. First up, the formerly (and soon to be again) nine-year-old founding member of the Jim Beam Small Batch Collection. Named for the river that Abe Lincoln grew up next to, please welcome to the stage: Knob Creek!

And their opponent is the most widely distributed release in the Very Old Barton family. Winner of the 2016 edition of the Bottom-Shelf Brackets, please welcome one of my favorite inexpensive bourbons: Very Old Barton 86 proof!

We strive to have a clean competition so these were tasted blind in the following order. Tasting notes are from before the reveal and may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and may influence one another.

Whiskey 1 (Knob Creek Bourbon)

Purchase Info: $24.98 for a 750 mL bottle, Ace Spirits, Hopkins, MN

Details: 50% ABV.

Nose: Toffee, crisp apple, nutmeg.

Mouth: Spicy and warm. Caramel apple, baking spice, vanilla.

Finish: Medium length. Cinnamon, oak, anise.

Whiskey 2 (Very Old Barton 86 proof)

Purchase Info: $16.99 for a 1L bottle, Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN

Details: 43% ABV.

Nose: Mint, cotton candy, oak.

Mouth: Cinnamon, nutmeg, mint, oak.

Finish: Medium length. Vanilla, cinnamon, hints of oak.

Pre-reveal Thoughts: I like the flavor on #2 slightly more than on #1. But #1 has a better mouth experience due to higher heat. This is much closer than our typical 1 vs 4 matchup. In the end, I think Whiskey #1 is more pleasurable, even though I had to spend way more time than I expected to find out.

Post-Reveal Thoughts: Close one tonight folks. And it might have been even closer if the proofs were equivalent. Knob Creek wins and is moving on to Round 2. The last time Very Old Barton was in the competition, they won it all. Will Knob Creek do the same? Only time will tell.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Barton, Bourbon, Sazerac, whiskey reviews, Brackets, I Like This!, Jim Beam
6 Comments

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2020: Round 1: Wild Turkey 101 vs. Four Roses

March 19, 2020 Eric Burke

The time is finally here! Let’s get down to the competitions. Round 1 of the 2020 BourbonGuy.com Bottom Shelf Brackets opens with Division 1 Number 1 seed Wild Turkey 101 versus Number 4 seed Four Roses. 

This is a battle of Lawrenceburg, Kentucky’s favorite sons. First up is the flagship product of the Wild Turkey distillery in Lawrenceburg, Kentucky, and tonight’s favorite. It is a two-time winner of the Bottom-Shelf Bracket contest in 2017 and 2019, winning both times it has appeared. Please welcome to the stage: Wild Turkey 101!

And their opponent is the entry-level release at the cross-town Four Roses distillery. Coming in a whopping 21° proof deficit. Please welcome fan-favorite mixer and wearer of the beige label: Four Roses Bourbon!

We strive to have a clean competition so these were tasted blind in the following order. Tasting notes are from before the reveal and may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time.

Whiskey 1 (Four Roses Bourbon)

Purchase Info: $19.99 for a 750 mL bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Details: 40% ABV.

Nose: Spearmint Candy, Cinnamon.

Mouth: Cinnamon, Caramel, hints of generic fruit.

Finish: Gentle and short. caramel and cinnamon.

Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey 101)

Purchase Info: $18.49 for a 750 mL bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Details: 50.5% ABV.

Nose: Brown sugar, caramel, a yeasty smell kinda like fresh-baked bread.

Mouth: Warm in the mouth with toffee and cinnamon.

Finish: Medium length. Warm cinnamon and nutmeg.

Pre-reveal Thoughts: Whiskey 1 has a cooler and thinner mouthfeel than whiskey 2. Guessing that the relative proof is showing its hand here. The flavor profiles are much more similar than I had expected but whiskey 2 is the clear winner.

Post-Reveal Thoughts: No upset tonight folks. The higher seed (and higher proof) wins in this one. Wild Turkey 101 wins the Battle of Lawrenceburg and is moving on to Round 2.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, Four Roses, Wild Turkey, whiskey reviews, Brackets, I Like This!
4 Comments

7th Annual BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Brackets: The Not-So-Bottom-Shelf Edition

March 17, 2020 Eric Burke

So, wow. A lot has happened in the last few weeks, huh?

A couple of weeks ago, I got the bright idea that I wanted to up the level of competition this year on the Bottom-Shelf Brackets. At the time it wasn’t for any real reason, I just thought it might be fun. Over the previous six years, we’ve explored the best of worst that bourbon has to offer. And, if we are being honest, some of the worst of the worst as well. This year, I had the idea to do something a little different.

In the past, I’ve had a definition of “bottom-shelf” that ranged from $15-$18 (or under) per 750, $20-$24 per liter and $35 per 1.75 liter. That definition got me a lot of entries by Heaven Hill and Jim Beam but only a couple from any other distilleries. I had one year where half of the entrants were Jim Beam products and another where half were from Heaven Hill. So this year I decided to limit each distillery to one entrant.

Of course, not all distilleries have products that meet the definitions that I had defined for “Bottom-Shelf.” So what was I to do? Well, for this year, I’ve decided to throw out any pretense that this is a competition between “bottom-shelf” bourbons. But that doesn’t mean that I’m going to go all-in and jump to the top of the price point. I mean, this is still a contest about being frugal.

That and I have to buy all of these things and I am still a freelancer…

So, here are the new rules:

  1. One entry per distillery

  2. Purchased for under $25. No matter the size. No matter if it was on sale.

  3. Available in the Twin Cities metro area.

That’s it. As a general guideline, I tried to find the “best” offering from each distillery at the price point. Once I purchased all the entrants, I needed to seed them into brackets. For that, I usually use proof and stated age, but since all of these are non-age stated, I went by proof and then flipped a coin when two were the same proof. In order to maintain balanced divisions, I alternated which division chooses first, so Division One got to chose first on the first round, but Division Two got to choose first on the second round, then One on the third and back to Two on the fourth.

So let’s meet the competition in this “Not-So-Bottom-Shelf” Bracket, shall we? It should come as no surprise that I was able to find entrants from Jim Beam, Heaven Hill, Wild Turkey, and Barton 1792. Each of these has produced winners in the past. In fact, some of those past winners are represented this year in Division Two, number four seed Very Old Barton 86 proof and Division One, number one seed Wild Turkey 101 proof. But I was a bit shocked to find that the Heaven Hill entry was Division One, number two seed Elijah Craig and that the Jim Beam entry was Division Two, number one seed Knob Creek. Though I’ve been able to find Knob Creek for about $25 for a while now, so it really shouldn’t have been that surprising. Rounding out the rest of our entrants from Division One are number three seed Makers Mark and number four seed Four Roses. In Division Two are number two seed Old Forester 100 proof and number three seed Buffalo Trace.

I can’t wait for this one. It should be fun!


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Barton, Bourbon, Brown Forman, Buffalo Trace, Four Roses, Heaven Hill, Wild Turkey, Brackets, Makers Mark, Jim Beam
9 Comments

Baker's Single Barrel

February 20, 2020 Eric Burke

It has been one thousand, nine hundred, and thirty four days since I last reviewed Baker’s Bourbon. In that time the brand has gone through some changes. It got a new bottle design, which I LOVE! But more importantly, it was revamped to be a single barrel product.

I’ve always liked Baker’s. If Knob Creek wasn’t super cheap a short walk from my house, it would be my go to product from Beam. When I first heard of it last year, I was a little nervous about the switch to Single Barrel, but also excited. Would they change it? Would it be better? Worse?

Of course, the roll out to the new product was super slow in my neck of the woods. I’m guessing that retailers were looking to sell out of the old Baker’s before they put the new one on the shelves. And this past weekend, I walked into the liquor store and finally saw it on the shelf.

I immediately noticed a couple things about it. One was the word “minimum” in the age statement. The other was that this particular bottle was aged over 8 years. My nervousness evaporated and my excitement took over. Unlike most producers, not only did Beam keep the age statement, in the case of this bottle they actually increased it.

Baker's Single Barrel Bourbon

Purchase Info: $46.99 for a 750 mL bottle at Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN

Price per Drink (50 mL): $3.13

Details: 8 years, 3 months old. Barreled in 10/2011. Aged in warehouse CL-Z. 53.5% ABV

Nose: Dusty oak, peanuts, brown sugar,

Mouth: Sweet and spicy with peanut, cinnamon, honey and oak

Finish: Warm and on the longer side of medium. Lingering notes of peanut, honey, mint and cinnamon red hots.

like-vector.png

Thoughts: I really like this. I've always found Baker's to be sweet, but I've never gotten such pronounced honey notes on it before. This is great.

But you might be asking yourself how it compares to the Small Batch? Well, when I heard that Baker’s was changing to Single Barrel, I poured off a healthy sample so that I could answer that very question.

Comparison to Small Batch: The noses are very similar with the Small Batch being a touch fruitier. The Small Batch is mintier and doesn't show as much peanut. The finishes are also very similar. Over all not much has changed and that's great news.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, whiskey reviews, I Like This!, Jim Beam
2 Comments

Corner Creek 10 year old

February 18, 2020 Eric Burke

I’ve been running this site for almost eight years now. I started slow, really only reviewing something about once every couple of months on average. (In a good month, there would be two posts at the beginning, so it isn’t quite as bad as it seems.) For the last six years or so, I’ve been pretty consistent about putting out two posts a week. And during that time, about 80 percent of them have been reviews, which is odd as I never set out to do a review site.

The idea for this site was a long time coming, but it boils down to one fact: I like to tell stories. I’d had a blog previously where I told stories. Twos of people read it. Occasionally a really popular post would go up, and maybe five people would. After that, I had a photoblog. I didn’t really care if anyone visited that site. The goal was for me to improve my photography skills. I took photos, post-processed them, and chose one for publication. I did that every day for three years. After I got to the point where I felt pretty good about my photo skills, I ended the photo a day project, and I told stories about photos instead.

Then I discovered bourbon. I learned everything I could about bourbon and other whiskeys. I read every book I could get my hands on, read every blog, listened to the podcast. Along the way, I realized something: I didn’t really like whiskey reviews. I liked the people that wrote them. I enjoyed the content around them. I liked the stories and personalities. But I didn’t like the reviews. They were either too sterile or too poetic for me. Some were basically just a rehashing of the press release. So, I went back to the idea I had with my photo site. I was going on a bourbon journey. I was trying to learn all there was to know about bourbon. And along the way, I’d share what I learned with everyone else. I didn’t plan on writing reviews, but Google seemed to like it the few times I did. And unlike the previous sites, I thought I might be able to contribute to the wider community. So since Google liked them, I decided to include them in the posts. I’d craft each story in such a way that it would weave into and set up the review. In a way, it was a lot like the photo-a-day project. Each time I did it, it got a little easier. And I became a better writer. And eventually, the reviews became fun. The stories and the reviews didn’t need to be woven together because frequently, the review would inspire the story.

So all of that is the background to this past weekend. I realized that my editorial calendar had run dry. Somehow, I just never planned past my tax appointment last Thursday. It was an odd feeling. And when put on the spot, I couldn’t think of anything that I wanted to write about. Not off the top of my head. So I decided to check the archives and see if there was something that I had overlooked over the years. Some easy to find bourbon that somehow slipped through the cracks.

And I realized that I didn’t have a list of what I had reviewed previously. Not one. Just the website itself. I’d been keeping track of everything in my head. Which if you know how my memory works, you’ll understand that it is the least safe place I could keep track of things. So I spent all weekend cataloging eight years’ worth of blog posts. And I found some things that I’d overlooked over the years. I filled a whiteboard with ideas.

Then I went to the store and immediately bought two bottles that were not on my list at all. Just because they looked interesting. Sigh. One of those bottles is a 10-year-old version of the Corner Creek that I featured in September of 2018. I did a pretty good intro to the brand there so I won’t rehash it here.

Corner Creek 10 year

Purchase Info: $50.99 for a 750 mL bottle at Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN

Price per Drink (50mL): $3.40

Details: 10 year age statement, 44% ABV.

Nose: Mixed berries, baking spice, brown sugar, mint

Mouth: Nicely spicy with notes of baking spice, juicy ripe fruit, mint, and caramel.

Finish: Nice finish. Medium length with notes of mixed berries, menthol, and cinnamon.

like-vector.png

Thoughts: This is pretty good. I like it. Very fruity with notes of mixed berries throughout the experience. The finish isn’t hot, but the menthol notes last a while.

When I revisited the standard Corner Creek, I called it a “change of pace” bourbon due to the very fruity nature of it. This lands in the same place. Very fruity. I wouldn’t want it all the time, but when I’m looking for something that is a little off the standard bourbon flavor profile, I’ll probably reach for this one.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

In Bourbon, whiskey reviews, Non-Distiller Producer, I Like This!
Comment
← Newer Posts Older Posts →

Want to support BourbonGuy.com? Please visit BourbonGuyGifts.com today!

Subscribe

Never miss another article! Sign up with your email address to receive an email notification when a new article publishes.

We respect your privacy.

Thank you!

by-nc.png

Except where otherwise noted, this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license. Some rights reserved.